Leiv Blad, Bryan Killian, Jan 27, 2010
Overturning a 96-year-old rule, the United States Supreme Court held in Leegin that minimum resale price maintenance (“RPM”) agreements would no longer be considered illegal per se under Section 1 of the Sherman Act, but instead would be evaluated under the more lenient “rule of reason.” A number of states immediately objected to the change, vowing to legislatively reverse Leegin. Maryland has already done so and other states may follow.
This flurry of legislative activity raises the question: Can a state overturn Leegin consistent with the United States Constitution? The answer to that question is no, at least to the extent the state regulates conduct that is wholly outside its borders.
Links to Full Content
Featured News
EU Regulators Set to Clear Microsoft’s $13B OpenAI Investment
Apr 17, 2024 by
CPI
Biden Pledges to Block US Steel Acquisition by Japanese Firm
Apr 17, 2024 by
CPI
Canada Targets Tech Titans with New Digital Tax in 2024
Apr 17, 2024 by
CPI
EU Privacy Watchdog Calls for Meta to Offer Ad-Free Option
Apr 17, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Overhaul Targets Tech Titans Like Apple
Apr 17, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – China Edition – Year of the Dragon
Apr 16, 2024 by
CPI
Review Logic and Rules for Concentrations of Undertakings that Do Not Meet the Standard of Notification
Apr 16, 2024 by
CPI
China’s Review of Semiconductor Transactions
Apr 16, 2024 by
CPI
Key Challenges and Tips for Merger Control Filing in China for Listed Companies
Apr 16, 2024 by
CPI
Key Point Review: China SPC Antitrust Judgments in 2023
Apr 16, 2024 by
CPI