By: John Bergmayer (Public Knowledge)
The long rivalry between tech giants Oracle and Google came to an end with a 2021 Supreme Court ruling that reinstated the view that Application Software Interfaces (APIs) – a form of software library – was fair use. Here, Google had written code that was indistinguishable in many ways to existing software published by developer Java, which was intended to help developers working on the new Android platform. In this case, Google’s implementation of Java-like APIs in the system allowed developers to make requests for information or actions that the system would easily understand. However, though the new ‘functional’ code may have been totally different from the original Java code, the programmers still have to call things by the same names in order for the program to work.
The Supreme Court correctly judged that this situation was pro-competitive and legitimate, as copyright law and IP protections are not meant to lock developers into specific proprietary platforms or to prevent the entry of new platforms that can be compatible with powerful incumbents…
Featured News
DOJ and FTC Introduce Website for Reporting Anti-Competitive Healthcare Practices
Apr 18, 2024 by
CPI
US Congress Advances Legislation to Compel TikTok Sale
Apr 18, 2024 by
CPI
UK Financial Sector Advocates Enhanced Regulatory Accountability
Apr 18, 2024 by
CPI
Google and All 50 States Defend $700 Million Consumer Settlement
Apr 18, 2024 by
CPI
Colorado Enacts First Law to Protect Consumer Brainwave Data
Apr 18, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – China Edition – Year of the Dragon
Apr 16, 2024 by
CPI
Review Logic and Rules for Concentrations of Undertakings that Do Not Meet the Standard of Notification
Apr 16, 2024 by
CPI
China’s Review of Semiconductor Transactions
Apr 16, 2024 by
CPI
Key Challenges and Tips for Merger Control Filing in China for Listed Companies
Apr 16, 2024 by
CPI
Key Point Review: China SPC Antitrust Judgments in 2023
Apr 16, 2024 by
CPI