On Tuesday a US appeals court in an antitrust ruling cautioned against efforts to broadly seal information in court filings.
The Atlanta-based 11th US Circuit Court of Appeals said in its ruling about competition in the toy industry that it was including it its decision pieces of information that it had earlier accepted under seal at the parties’ request. The court said information that otherwise was already public or would not harm a proprietary interest should not be shielded.
The underlying dispute involved the market for wooden play kitchens, and a three-judge panel upheld a ruling that said Dallas-based KidKraft had not conspired to violate federal antitrust law with the private equity firm that controls the company. Some of the information that was sealed included market share and industry rankings.
“Much of the information that was redacted should not have been,” Circuit Judge William Pryor wrote for the panel, including Judges Robin Rosenbaum and Andrew Brasher.
Companies and other parties are allowed to take steps to minimize or block disclosure of information that they consider confidential business details. Judges balance those requests with the presumption that court records are subject to a public right of access.
Transparency advocates have long complained about a lack of uniform procedure in the federal court when it comes to sealing information. UCLA School of Law professor Eugene Volokh, who tracks transparency in the courts, in 2020 said “records are still sometimes sealed erroneously, for reasons that fall short of what the public access precedents require.”
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Cisco Closes $28 Billion Splunk Deal
Mar 19, 2024 by
CPI
Ropes & Gray Strengthens Antitrust Practice with New Partner
Mar 19, 2024 by
CPI
Biden Administration Supports Antitrust Suit Against FIFA
Mar 18, 2024 by
CPI
Apple in Talks to Incorporate Google’s Gemini AI Amid Antitrust Scrutiny
Mar 18, 2024 by
CPI
Appeals Court Revives Regeneron’s Antitrust Lawsuit Against Novartis Over Vision Treatment
Mar 18, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Pricing Algorithms
Feb 28, 2024 by
CPI
Pricing Algorithms and Antitrust Enforcement: Sandboxes to the Rescue?
Feb 28, 2024 by
CPI
AI, Algorithmic Pricing, and Collusion
Feb 28, 2024 by
CPI
Competition & Collusion in a World of Algorithmic Pricing: Antitrust Risks & Enforcement Trends
Feb 28, 2024 by
CPI
Pricing Algorithms in Antitrust’s Sights?
Feb 28, 2024 by
CPI