Attorneys who prosecuted Microsoft for purported antitrust contraventions in the ’90s noticed some familiar procedures in the Department of Justice’s case against Google. However, multiple attorneys told CNBC that it is much different than an exact copy of the former case.
Stephen Houck, who served as the top attorney for the states in the Microsoft case, said, “What they’re trying to do is fit the facts of Google Into the theory of Microsoft.” However, he said that he believes the relevant facts are “very different.”
“I think they’re going to have a very difficult time proving this,” Houck said. He informed the outlet that he has consulted for Google during the last few years, but his questioning of the case’s strength arises from his own view.
Google’s leading attorney referred to the complaint as “deeply flawed” in a web post noting the firm’s first objections.
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Mexican Watchdog Probes Amazon and Mercado Libre Over Loyalty Bundles
Apr 23, 2024 by
CPI
Competition Commission of India to Probe AI Landscape for Competition
Apr 23, 2024 by
CPI
Canada’s Agricultural Giants in Antitrust Spotlight
Apr 23, 2024 by
CPI
US House Passes Bill That Could Lead to TikTok Ban
Apr 23, 2024 by
CPI
ADM CFO Resigns Amidst DOJ Investigation Into Accounting Issues
Apr 23, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI