Best Practices in Article 101 and 102 Proceedings: Some Suggestions for Improved Transparency

Marcus Glader, Jan 07, 2011

DG Competition has recently published three draft guidance papers setting out best practices for antitrust proceedings. The aim is to enhance transparency and predictability in the Commission’s proceedings, while ensuring the efficiency of investigations into suspected competition law violations. This article focuses on the Commission’s Best Practices on the conduct of proceedings concerning Articles 101 and 102 TFEU (the Best Practices) and considers potential improvements regarding access to documents and information in the Commission procedure.

The Commission has developed a number of practices to increase both efficiency and transparency during the investigative phase; these have now been fleshed out in the Best Practices. These practices include different kinds of meetings and disclosure of key submissions prior to the Statement of Objections (“SO”), thereby providing the parties concerned with some insight into the investigation and allowing them to express their views at an early stage in the proceedings. Nevertheless, the Commission could do more within the current institutional structure, in particular, to increase transparency and due process in the critical phase between SO and the Commission’s decision. The Competition Commissioners and other Commission officials have often emphasized that due process is safeguarded since there are a number of “checks and balances” and that the decision is ultimately made by other people than those inv

ACCESS TO THIS ARTICLE IS RESTRICTED TO SUBSCRIBERS

Please sign in or join us
to access premium content!