By Michael Han, Bryan Fu & Christoph van Opstal
In early 2019, China’s antitrust authority found that Eastman China abused its dominance in the market for CS-12 coalescent. The Eastman case demonstrates that certain trading restrictions such as most-favored-nation clauses will not fall foul of China’s Anti-Monopoly Law in isolation but may raise concerns in aggregation and on a case-by-case basis where they together can be classified as measures to achieve exclusivity in the context of d
...THIS ARTICLE IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR IP ADDRESS 18.117.152.251
Please verify email or join us to access premium content!