APR-14(1)

Spring 2014, Volume 4 Number 1

In this issue:

We're looking at two volatile media questions—the hotly debated Comcast/Time Warner merger in the U.S. and media plurality in the U.K. Understanding the Comcast merger requires an appreciation that the diverse services the company provides—pay television, broadband, and content—create horizontal & vertical merger issues plus a variety of possible remedies. And, as the U.K. drafts new plurality regulations, there is an intriguing question: Can antitrust lessons be used to measure possible problems, create remedies, and overcome possible bias?

The Comcast-Time Warner Proposed Merger
  1. Allen Grunes, Maurice Stucke, Apr 14, 2014

    The Beneficent Monopolist

    Notwithstanding Comcast’s and TWC’s assertions, combining two monopolies does not yield better service, lower retail prices, more innovation, and greater choices for consumers. Allen P. Grunes (GeyerGorey LLP) & Maurice E. Stucke (Univ. of Tennessee College of Law)

    Tags:
  2. Geoffrey Manne, Apr 14, 2014

    Beneficence is Beside the Point: The Antitrust Realities of the Comcast/Time Warner Cable Merger

    Properly understood, the proposed Comcast/TWC merger presents no competitive concerns. Geoffrey Manne (International Center for Law and Economics)

    Tags:
  3. Jarod Bona, Apr 14, 2014

    The Comcast-TWC Merger: Limit the Government’s Options

    It would serve competition and antitrust if the antitrust agency didn’t have the option of the shiny, but dangerous, tool known as a conduct remedy. Jarod Bona (Bona Law PC)

    Tags:
  4. Jamillia Padua Ferris, Amanda Wait, Apr 14, 2014

    Analysis of Changes in Bargaining Power in DOJ/FCC Review of Comcast/Time Warner

    The agencies likely will focus their reviews of potential anticompetitive effects on how the expansions of the pay television and broadband networks affect Comcast’s incentives in dealing with content providers. Jamillia Ferris & Amanda Wait (Hunton & Williams LLP)

    Tags:
  5. Adam J. Miller, Apr 14, 2014

    Widgets All the Way Down

    While most transactions are challenged because they are alleged to have unilateral or coordinated effects, whether this cable deal is challenged may turn on vertical issues. Adam J. Miller (Fredrikson & Byron)

    Tags:
  6. Anant Raut, Apr 14, 2014

    Beyond Comcast-Time Warner Cable: The Fragmentation of the American Internet

    The fate of Comcast-Time Warner Cable is almost an afterthought for web content creators, who are facing a much more existential threat. Anant Raut

    Tags:
Media Plurality Regulation—Antitrust Lessons
  1. Martin Cave, Apr 14, 2014

    On the Relationship Between Media Plurality Legislation and Competition Law

    At the level of measurement, and, particularly, in the choice of remedies, there are lessons to be learned from competition law which can be applied to the regulation of plurality. Martin Cave (Imperial College Business School & the U.K. Competition Commission)

    Tags:
  2. David Reader, Apr 14, 2014

    Does Ofcom Offer a Credible Solution to Bias in Media Public Interest Mergers in the United Kingdom?

    Should a conflict arise between the findings of the CMA and Ofcom on whether or not to permit the merger, the Ofcom Board would be tasked with balancing the conflicting interests and reaching a final decision—this is where the integrity of the proposed new regime begins to unravel. David Reader (Univ. of East Anglia Law School)

    Tags:

Subscribe to CPI

CPI has a variety of subscription options to meet your needs. Get all the in-depth information you need about global antitrust and competition policy.

Our readers visit us from over 150 countries. Welcome to our global community.

Subscribe Now

For group or institution wide subscriptions please contact us for more details.

Sign-up For Our Daily Newsletter

In The News

About the Antitrust Chronicle

The CPI Antitrust Chronicle is published online, semi-monthly. It contains cutting-edge commentary on current global antitrust and competition policy issues.

Past Issues

Archives

Editor-in-Chief: David S. Evans

Managing Editor: Carolyn Vallejo

Senior Editor: Lindsay W. McSweeney

Co-editor: Elisa Mariscal

Associate Editor and Community Manager: Meara Hamidiani

Associate Editor: Anna Tzanaki

Office Manager: Kristen Adrian

Editorial Advisory Board:

Rosa Abrantes-Metz, Global Econ. Group, Stern School of Bus. at NYU

Kent Bernard, Fordham School of Law

Rachel Brandenburger, Washington D.C.

Adrian Emch, Hogan Lovells

Kyriakos Fountoukakos, Herbert Smith

Jay Himes, Labaton Sucharow

James Killick, White & Case

Stephen Kinsella, Sidley Austin

Ioannis Lianos, University College London

Robert O'Donoghue, Brick Court Chambers

Aaron Panner, Kellogg, Huber, Hansen