On Monday, December 17, the European Commission fined the clothing company Guess €39.8 million (US$45.2 million) for restricting retailers from online advertising and selling cross-border to consumers in other Member States (“geo-blocking”), in breach of EU competition rules.
Commissioner Margrethe Vestager, in charge of competition policy, said, “Guess’ distribution agreements tried to prevent EU consumers from shopping in other Member States by blocking retailers from advertising and selling cross-border. This allowed the company to maintain artificially high retail prices, in particular in Central and Eastern European countries. As a result, we have today sanctioned Guess for this behaviour. Our case complements the geoblocking rules that entered into force on 3 December – both address the issue of sales restrictions that are at odds with the Single Market.”
The investigation into Guess began in June 2017 following a year-long inquiry into the cross-border online sales practices of 1,900 companies.
The European Commission said Guess’ distribution deals with retailers restricted them from using the Guess brand names and trademarks for online search advertising and also prevented them from setting the retail price independently.
Specifically, the investigation found that Guess’ distribution agreements restricted authorized retailers from:
-
using the Guess brand names and trademarks for the purposes of online search advertising;
-
selling online without a prior specific authorization by Guess. The company had full discretion for this authorization, which was not based on any specified quality criteria;
-
selling to consumers located outside the authorized retailers’ allocated territories;
-
cross-selling among authorized wholesalers and retailers; and
-
independently deciding on the retail price at which they sell Guess products.
Guess cooperated with the Commission beyond its legal obligation to do so, in particular by revealing an infringement of EU competition rules not yet known to the Commission – the prohibition to use Guess brand names and trademarks for the purposes of online search advertising. Therefore, the Commission granted Guess a 50% fine reduction in return for this cooperation.
ission – the prohibition to use Guess brand names and trademarks for the purposes of online search advertising. Therefore, the Commission granted Guess a 50% fine reduction in return for this cooperation.
Full Content: Reuters & Europa Press
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
FTC Throws the Bag: Tapestry’s Capri Deal Blocked Over Market Monopoly Concerns
Apr 22, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Antitrust Authority Investigates Enel’s Communication of Energy Price Hikes
Apr 22, 2024 by
CPI
UK Data Regulator Uncovers Flaws in Google’s Privacy Sandbox Proposal
Apr 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Body Orders Google to Amend Ad Search Practices
Apr 22, 2024 by
CPI
Senator Blackburn Blasts Ticketmaster Amid DOJ Probe
Apr 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI