U.S. District Court Judge Paul A. Magnuson has dismissed an antitrust lawsuit brought by former NFL players Gene Washington, Diron Talbert, and Sean Lumpkin. The ex-players had alleged that the NFL monopolized the market for their images and likenesses.
The court distinguished American Needle from the case at hand by noting that the intellectual property involved here was historical game footage properly collectively owned by the NFL and the teams, not property owned only by the team, such as logos or colors. In addition, the court found that the NFL’s copyright ownership for the footage cannot be considered a restraint of trade.
In sum, the court characterized the plaintiffs’ claims as “[those] for royalties, not claims for antitrust.”
Full content: Court Opinion
Related content: Joint Ventures and the Sherman Act: The Problem Revealed by American Needle and How Best to Address It
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
DOJ and FTC Introduce Website for Reporting Anti-Competitive Healthcare Practices
Apr 18, 2024 by
CPI
US Congress Advances Legislation to Compel TikTok Sale
Apr 18, 2024 by
CPI
UK Financial Sector Advocates Enhanced Regulatory Accountability
Apr 18, 2024 by
CPI
Google and All 50 States Defend $700 Million Consumer Settlement
Apr 18, 2024 by
CPI
Colorado Enacts First Law to Protect Consumer Brainwave Data
Apr 18, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI