Feb-07(2)

In this issue:

The U.S. Supreme Court’s Decision in Weyerhaeuser

Feb 14, 2007

Background on: Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Ross-Simmons Lumber Co., Inc.

At issue in this case was whether the test applied for analyzing predatory pricing claims, first articulated by the U.S. Supreme Court in Brooke Group, Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 509 U.S. 209 (1993), should also be applied to claims of predatory bidding.

David Olsky, Feb 22, 2007

Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Ross-Simmons Hardwood Lumber Co.: Extending The Rule of Brooke Group, But How Far?

The general legal standard for determining whether unilateral conduct violates Section 2 of the Sherman Act is murky, to say the least.

David Park, William Rooney, Raymond Sarola, Feb 23, 2007

Weyerhaeuser v. Ross-Simmons: The U.S. Supreme Court Rules That The Brooke Group Predatory-Pricing Test Applies to Predatory Bidding

The Court has continued its course of limiting judicial interference with market forces to situations where a distinct and anticompetitive distortion is evident and in a manner that will not likely discourage pro-competitive innovation and an efficient allocation of resources.

ACCESS TO THIS ARTICLE IS RESTRICTED TO SUBSCRIBERS

Please sign in or join us
to access premium content!