French competition authorities fined endive producer organizations and related associations almost 4 million euros in 2007 for anti-competitive practices, including working together to set the price of endives and agreeing the quantity of the vegetable to be placed onto the market.
However, the producers argued that they were only doing what was required of them under EU agricultural law, which tasks farmers with creating associations in order to stabilize prices and manage production against demand. Performing that task justified the practices, they said.
The French Court of Cassation has asked the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) to clarify the issue.
In a non-binding opinion in the case, advocate general Nils Wahl said that producers and associations do have the general objectives of adjusting production to account for demand, reducing production costs and stabilizing producer prices. In carrying out those tasks, they are effectively forums for collective concertation, he said.
On the exchange of strategic information, the advocate general said that the tasks assigned to the producers and associations necessarily involve exchanges of strategic information internally, with the result that the competition rules will generally not be applicable within a producer or association.
However, the communication of prices between producers, associations and other competing entities, cannot be linked to these tasks and are therefore subject to the principle of the prohibition of anti-competitive agreements, decisions and concerted practices.
Opinions of advocates general are not binding on the court, but are followed in the majority of cases.
Full Content: Out Law
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
DOJ and FTC Introduce Website for Reporting Anti-Competitive Healthcare Practices
Apr 18, 2024 by
CPI
US Congress Advances Legislation to Compel TikTok Sale
Apr 18, 2024 by
CPI
UK Financial Sector Advocates Enhanced Regulatory Accountability
Apr 18, 2024 by
CPI
Google and All 50 States Defend $700 Million Consumer Settlement
Apr 18, 2024 by
CPI
Colorado Enacts First Law to Protect Consumer Brainwave Data
Apr 18, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI