Huawei Technologies: More Certainty on SEP Injunctions, But Not the End of the Story

This article is part of a Chronicle. See more from this Chronicle

Kyriakos Fountoukakos, Nick Root, Oct 27, 2015

The issue of declared standard-essential patents and competition law has been a hot topic that has pitted holders of SEPs and users of SEPs against one another in a patent war game with Article 102 TFEU as ammunition. The long awaited judgment of the Court of Justice of the EU  in Huawei Technologiesattempts to put an end to the war by striking a careful balance between protection for SEP holders on the one hand and undue delay for implementers in bringing their products to the market on the other.

The judgment builds on the previous decisions of the European Commission in relation to previous cases involving Samsung and Motorola but provides more detailed guidance and welcome clarity to both SEP holders and implementers as to what steps each must take in order to retain either the right to request, or the right to object to a claim for, an injunction preventing use of an SEP. Significantly, it reaffirms that an alleged infringer cannot be criticized for challenging, or insisting on reserving the right to challenge, in any negotiations the essentiality or validity of the SEP(s) in question.

The judgment holds that an owner of SEPs who has given a fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory undertaking may be abusing its dominant position by seeking an injunction against an alleged infringer, unless the SEP holder alerts the alleged infringer and provides a sp…

ACCESS TO THIS ARTICLE IS RESTRICTED TO SUBSCRIBERS

Please sign in or join us
to access premium content!