Antitrust legal frameworks around the world have long been hostile to minimum resale price maintenance (“RPM”). Contemporary U.S. antitrust law is more hospitable towards RPM arrangements than EU law is. Chinese courts and antitrust agencies have conflicting practices of minimum RPM enforcement. This paper evaluates the existing evidence, economic analysis, and legal framework – structured rule of reason versus hardcore restraint – regarding the effects of minimum RPM across diff
...THIS ARTICLE IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR IP ADDRESS 3.145.131.28
Please verify email or join us to access premium content!