Johnson & Johnson Vision Care Inc has agreed to pay $55 million to end an antitrust case in US federal court over the pricing of disposable contact lenses, marking the largest settlement in the private class action and the last defendant to resolve claims.
The settlement amount was shown in a court filing on Wednesday from the plaintiffs’ lawyers leading the case in Tampa, Florida, federal court. They are seeking preliminary approval of the deal, which was first announced last month but without any details about the settlement amount.
J&J Vision reached an agreement on the eve of a trial scheduled in US District Court for the Middle District of Florida. Separately, eye care device company Alcon Vision agreed to pay $20 million to settle antitrust claims in the case also shortly before trial was set to begin on March 28.
A lawyer for J&J Vision, William Cavanaugh Jr of Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler, did not immediately reply to a request for comment on Thursday.
J&J Vision has continued to deny the plaintiffs’ claims of a market pricing conspiracy, and the company has said it believes its conduct was proper.
“We acted appropriately and responsibly in the marketing of our products and this settlement is not an admission of liability or wrongdoing,” J&J Vision said in a statement.
The plaintiffs’ consumer complaints, first filed in 2015, alleged major eye care companies and a distributor agreed to restrain competition for certain disposable contact lenses. Consumer purchasers claimed the defendants “conspired to eliminate discounting of contact lenses by ensuring that all retailers charged the same minimum price.”
Lawyers for the plaintiffs have estimated up to 40 million purchasers of disposable contact lenses were subject to the defendants’ alleged minimum retail pricing scheme.
Plaintiffs’ lawyer Joseph Guglielmo of New York’s Scott+Scott Attorneys did not immediately reply to a request for comment.
In their filing on Wednesday, the plaintiffs’ lawyers said the J&J and Alcon deals were “excellent results” given the complexity of the case and “the significant risks and barriers of a jury trial and appellate review.”
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
FTC Urged to Enforce Rarely Used Antitrust Law Against Retail Giants
Mar 28, 2024 by
CPI
UK’s Fingleton Bolsters Team with New Additions
Mar 28, 2024 by
CPI
Britain’s Competition Regulator Clears Aviva’s Acquisition of AIG Life UK
Mar 28, 2024 by
CPI
White House Implements New AI Safeguards to Protect Rights and Safety
Mar 28, 2024 by
CPI
Denver Court Sets August Date for Kroger-Albertsons Merger Showdown
Mar 28, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Real Estate & Antitrust
Mar 27, 2024 by
CPI
Systematic National Evidence of Steering by Real Estate Agents
Mar 27, 2024 by
CPI
Compliance Now! Actionable Antitrust Advice for the Residential Real Estate Industry
Mar 27, 2024 by
CPI
Real Estate Commissions: Some Insights from the Economics of Multi-Sided Platforms
Mar 27, 2024 by
CPI
New Ideas for Promoting Real Estate Brokerage Price Competition
Mar 27, 2024 by
CPI