We begin this month with two posts from the high-tech world, looking at Apple’s new iPhone launch and playing “what if” on the 10th anniversary of the Microsoft Decision. Our blogs go on to analyze a unique market effect from the BP Spill, ask if the DOJ equates price-fixing with a refusal to honor health regulations, wonder why the Korean FTC seems to care more about Hong Kong consumers than the HK Commission, stout-heartedly deny that the Irish Competition Authority is full of zombies, and debate whether antitrust theory properly deals with competition vs. cooperation in the consumer benefit context. We finish with an introspective question—Do AT lawyers need a shrink?
Apple’s new iPhone is recording record sales, but AT&T is still having trouble providing coverage. Is it ATT’s or the FCC’s fault?
Should BP reimburse the consumer for the market effects caused by the oil spill?
Has the Justice Department unambiguously stated that refusing to accept government price controls is a form of illegal price-fixing?
HK Competition Law wonders why the Korean Fair Trade Commission looks after the interests of Hong Kong citizens more ably that Hong Kong’s own competition authority, at least in regards to Cathay Pacific.
The Chairperson of the Irish Competition Authority counters accusations that the Commission is pursuing policies of open, unfettered, and untamed competition.
Michael Martin challenges Thom Lambert on whether antitrust theory should emphasize competition among groups over cooperation within groups as a driver of consumer benefit.
And the recent attention to the role of behavioral economics in antitrust raises an interesting question:
Save July 7 for the 2010 Jevons Colloquium on Competition on Digital Media and the Internet—the Related Roles of Antitrust, Consumer Protection, and Regulation
The 2010 Jevons Colloquium will bring together head of authorities, senior enforcers, business representatives. academics, and the leading experts from the EU and United States to discuss—in a digital media context—market power, data protection and privacy, incentives for content and infrastructure investment, innovation, and consumer protection.
Joaquin Almunia, the EU Competition Commissioner, John Fingleton, OFT’s Chief Executive, and Julie Brill, recently appointed Commissioner at the U.S. Federal Trade Commission will start the debate. Ed Richards, Ofcom’s Chief Executive, will give a key note address. Other senior enforcers and leading experts include: Per Hellstrom of DG Competition at the European Commission; Thibaud Vergé, Chief Economist at the French Competition Authority, Heather Clayton, Senior Director of OFT and responsible for the OFT recent study on online targeting; Jon Baker, Professor at the American University; Andrea Coscelli, Director of Competition Economics at Ofcom, and Pamela Harbour, former Commissioner at the Federal Trade Commission.
For more information, visit http://competition-internet.eventbrite.com/.
And, as always, please feel free to present us with any feedback. To
comment on the site, just click on the “contact us” box at the bottom of our home page. Or add your comments to any specific article through the comment box on any article page. |
Featured News
DOJ and FTC Introduce Website for Reporting Anti-Competitive Healthcare Practices
Apr 18, 2024 by
CPI
US Congress Advances Legislation to Compel TikTok Sale
Apr 18, 2024 by
CPI
UK Financial Sector Advocates Enhanced Regulatory Accountability
Apr 18, 2024 by
CPI
Google and All 50 States Defend $700 Million Consumer Settlement
Apr 18, 2024 by
CPI
Colorado Enacts First Law to Protect Consumer Brainwave Data
Apr 18, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – China Edition – Year of the Dragon
Apr 16, 2024 by
CPI
Review Logic and Rules for Concentrations of Undertakings that Do Not Meet the Standard of Notification
Apr 16, 2024 by
CPI
China’s Review of Semiconductor Transactions
Apr 16, 2024 by
CPI
Key Challenges and Tips for Merger Control Filing in China for Listed Companies
Apr 16, 2024 by
CPI
Key Point Review: China SPC Antitrust Judgments in 2023
Apr 16, 2024 by
CPI