Marathon Petroleum dodged a gasoline price-fixing lawsuit brought by the state of Kentucky, with a federal judge ruling that the state’s economic expert failed to properly define the market it accused Marathon of manipulating.
The expert report “fails to establish a relevant market, calculates damages based on a flawed comparison, and makes no attempt to control for the impact of defendants’ pro-competitive behavior,” Judge David J. Hale for the Western District of Kentucky wrote Monday, June 1.
The antitrust suit targeted supply agreements allegedly used by Marathon, one of the country’s largest refiners, to restrict the ability of “unbranded” gas stations to compete.
Full Content: Bloomberg
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
DOJ and FTC Introduce Website for Reporting Anti-Competitive Healthcare Practices
Apr 18, 2024 by
CPI
US Congress Advances Legislation to Compel TikTok Sale
Apr 18, 2024 by
CPI
UK Financial Sector Advocates Enhanced Regulatory Accountability
Apr 18, 2024 by
CPI
Google and All 50 States Defend $700 Million Consumer Settlement
Apr 18, 2024 by
CPI
Colorado Enacts First Law to Protect Consumer Brainwave Data
Apr 18, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI