MAY-12(1)

The U.K. competition authority structure is undergoing remodeling and we have several experts weighing in to take questions: How is the new organization going to react with other U.K. authorities? How best to integrate two different approaches to decision making? Should merger notification still be voluntary? What are the appropriate safeguards to ensure impartial decisions? What does the¬†removal of “dishonesty” from the cartel offense mean? Both already established and newly developing competition regimes should be able to learn a lot from the U.K. process.¬†And since we like to track of the ongoing saga of the antitrust world v. Google, we present a comparison with the historical Microsoft case. Enjoy!

Restructuring a Competition Authority: The U.K. Challenge

Bruce Lyons, May 14, 2012

Will the New U.K. Competition and Markets Authority Make Better Antitrust Decisions?

To understand the potential effectiveness of the CMA, we need to understand the organizations that are being merged. The CC and OFT are very different animals. Bruce Lyons (CCP, Univ. of East Anglia)

Valentine Korah, Despoina Mantzari, May 14, 2012

It Takes One to Tango: The Single U.K. Competition And Markets Authority

What, however, has been less emphasized in the discussions surrounding the reform is the role of the CAT in this new institutional setting. Despoina Mantzari & Valentine Korah (UCL)

Renato Nazzini, May 14, 2012

Functional Separation in the U.K. Competition Regime

ACCESS TO THIS ARTICLE IS RESTRICTED TO SUBSCRIBERS

Please sign in or join us
to access premium content!