There have been recent calls for nationwide bans on non-compete agreements. Such sentiment is no surprise in healthcare, particularly in physician labor markets. And yet there are many procompetitive justifications for non-compete agreements where they are an important tool to encourage investment. It is well-recognized that these agreements protect investments that would otherwise be expropriated due to hold-up, including trade secrets, customer relationships, recruitment of unique employees, specific training, and specialized capital investment. Healthcare settings often necessitate many of these investments simultaneously, and as a result, investment hold-up is often a significant issue. Empirical literature supports the view that non-compete agreements help promote investment in healthcare. Further, bans to non-compete agreements risk discouraging investment and furthering problems in many healthcare settings that are already facing shortages. We urge a more comprehensive view of non-compete agreements that includes consideration of the investments they help facilitate.

By Paul Wong, Yun Ling, Emily Walden1

 

I. INTRODUCTION

Non-compete agreements and restrictive covenants in employment contracts have received renewed attention from policy makers and antitrust practitioners, with many raising concerns that these agreements may restrict competition and labor-force mobility.2 For example, federal antitrust agencies have sought comments on the topic,3 state att

ACCESS TO THIS ARTICLE IS RESTRICTED TO SUBSCRIBERS

Please sign in or join us
to access premium content!