Autumn 2011, Volume 11 Number 1

In this issue:

We have two indisputable facts in this issue: The Foreign Trade Antitrust Improvements Act is, to be kind, muddled. And modern court decisions on federal pleading standards haven't exactly been uniform. So what happens when the two collide, as in the recent Potash decision? Our authors have brilliantly highlighted the issues; but, as might be expected, have reached quite different conclusions. Plus there's a bonus—given the complexity, we've added a resource providing reprints and downloadable copies of the key cases and legislation. And since we're discussing extraterritorial matters, we've added a special interest article on a novel approach to untangling the thorny issue of how the EU should compensate cartel victims—without involving U.S. law. 


Potash & the FTAIA
  1. Alicia Batts, Keith Butler, Nov 16, 2011

    Recovery in the U.S. for Price Fixing Abroad: The Future of FTAIA Litigation

    Defendants may find it more difficult to win early dismissal, and avoid expensive discovery, in antitrust cases involving foreign conduct affecting U.S. commerce. Alicia Batts & Keith Butler (Proskauer)

  2. Max Huffman, Nov 16, 2011

    New Lessons for Pleading the FTAIA

    Minn-Chem v. Agrium is the latest in a long line of opinions reflecting courts’ suspicions of private plaintiff efforts to expand the scope of private antitrust enforcement. Max Huffman (Indiana Univ.)

  3. Erika Douglas, Mark Katz, Nov 16, 2011

    Minn-Chem Incorporated et al. v. Agrium Incorporated et al.: A Canadian Perspective on the Extraterritorial Application of U.S. Antitrust Law

    Enforcement restraint is particularly appropriate in circumstances where the conduct at issue, insofar as Canada is concerned, was not illegal at all. Mark Katz & Erika Douglas (Davies, Ward)

  4. Chris Sagers, Nov 16, 2011

    A Tale of Two Panels: The Size of the Chancellor’s Foot in Text Messaging and Potash

    Why was one traditional, well established plus-factors pleading “plausible” and a very similar one “implausible”? Chris Sagers (Cleveland State Univ.)

  5. Nov 16, 2011

    Resources—Potash, the FTAIA, and Pleading Requirements

    An easy source to find the materials referred to in the NOV (1) Antitrust Chronicle issue on the Potash case.

EU Victim Compensation
  1. Kent Bernard, Nov 16, 2011

    A Trip Around the Cartel Victims Remedy Buffet

    There is another possible approach—besides the Zen Platter, the Foie Gras-Stuffed Creampuff, and the ADR Health Food Box—which has received very little attention. Kent Bernard (Fordham Law)


About the Antitrust Chronicle

The CPI Antitrust Chronicle is published online, semi-monthly. It contains cutting-edge commentary on current global antitrust and competition policy issues.

Past Issues


Editor-in-Chief: David S. Evans

Managing Editor: Lauren Chiang

Senior Editor: Lindsay W. McSweeney

Social Media: Anna Tzanaki

Subscription Manager: Susan Roberts

Office Manager: Kristen Adrian

Editorial Advisory Board:

Rosa Abrantes-Metz, AFE Consulting, Stern School of Business at NYU

Kent Bernard, Fordham School of Law

Rachel Brandenburger, Washington D.C.

Adrian Emch, Hogan Lovells

Kyriakos Fountoukakos, Herbert Smith

Jay Himes, Labaton Sucharow

James Killick, White & Case

Stephen Kinsella, Sidley Austin

Ioannis Lianos, University College London

Elisa Mariscal, Federal Competition Commission, Mexico

Robert O'Donoghue, Brick Court Chambers

Aaron Panner, Kellogg, Huber, Hansen

Nicolas Petit, University of Lìege

Daniel Sokol, University of Florida Levin School of Law

Joshua Wright, George Mason Law School