Sep-07(1) & (2)

In this issue:

The Court of First Instance’s Decision in Microsoft

Sep 14, 2007

Background on: Microsoft v. Commission of the European Communities

Background, case history and related materials on Microsoft v. Commission decided by the European Court of First Instance.

Luke Froeb, Sep 17, 2007

European Antitrust: Is Big Bad Again?

Every MBA program in every country teaches students to compete using the “four P’s” of marketing: price, product, place, and promotion. So when Microsoft began distributing its media player with its operating system, it would seem that it was competing by taking advantage of its low cost distribution channel (“place”) and by improving functionality (“product.”)

Daniel Spulber, Sep 18, 2007

Competition Policy in Europe: Harming Incentives to Innovate

The European Court of First Instance, through its decision in Microsoft v. Commission, dealt a one-two punch to incentives to innovate. First, by penalizing Microsoft for bundling its Media Player with Windows, the court will make companies reluctant to add innovative features to their products. Second, by sanctioning Microsoft for not disclosing fundamental innovations to its server software to its rivals, the court will make companies think twice before investing in costly research and development (R&D).

Nicholas Economides, Sep 20, 2007

The EU Microsoft Antitrust Case

The consequences of the CFI’s decision are significant both for Microsoft and the computing indus

ACCESS TO THIS ARTICLE IS RESTRICTED TO SUBSCRIBERS

Please sign in or join us
to access premium content!