The Alignment of Evidence and Economic Theory in FTC v. Qualcomm: A Response to Ginsburg & Wright

April 2019

NORTH AMERICA COLUMN BANNER

The Alignment of Evidence and Economic Theory in FTC v. Qualcomm: A Response to Ginsburg & Wright By Joseph Kattan & Timothy J. Muris (Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher; Sidley Austin)1

In a recent post on CPI Journal’s Blog O’ Blogs, Judge Douglas Ginsburg and Professor Joshua Wright criticize the expert testimony of Professor Carl Shapiro in the FTC’s case against Qualcomm.2 Ginsburg & Wright contend that Shapiro’s Nash bargaining model was “based upon assumptions that are contrary to real-world evidence and [] does not robustly or persuasively identify antico…

ACCESS TO THIS ARTICLE IS RESTRICTED TO SUBSCRIBERS

Please sign in or join us
to access premium content!