Gig workers in California who drive for Uber, Lyft, and other rideshare and delivery platforms have filed a lawsuit in the state’s Supreme Court seeking to overturn Proposition 22, the Associated Press reported on Wednesday, January 13.
The California ballot initiative Prop 22 was upheld on Election Day in November, with 58% of voters supporting the measure that defines gig workers as independent contractors. The lawsuit claims that the new mandate is unconstitutional because it limits the government’s ability to empower workers to form unions. It also prevents drivers from getting workers’ compensation.
The ballot measure was promoted and supported by a US$200 million campaign funded by Uber, Lyft, and similar platforms. Labor unions burned through some US$20 million to fight the measure, and have now joined the new lawsuit filed by drivers.
Before Prop 22, California lawmakers were pushing for gig workers to be classified as company employees, which would make them eligible for health insurance and other benefits and provide protection against job loss.
“Prop. 22 doesn’t just fail our state rideshare drivers; it fails the basic test of following our state constitution,” Bob Schoonover of the Service Employees International Union told the AP. “The law as written by Uber and Lyft denies drivers rights under the law in California and makes it nearly impossible for lawmakers to fix these problems.”
Featured News
DOJ and FTC Introduce Website for Reporting Anti-Competitive Healthcare Practices
Apr 18, 2024 by
CPI
US Congress Advances Legislation to Compel TikTok Sale
Apr 18, 2024 by
CPI
UK Financial Sector Advocates Enhanced Regulatory Accountability
Apr 18, 2024 by
CPI
Google and All 50 States Defend $700 Million Consumer Settlement
Apr 18, 2024 by
CPI
Colorado Enacts First Law to Protect Consumer Brainwave Data
Apr 18, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI