UK Procurement Bill, General Principles, and Additivity – Why There Is No Such Risk
By: Albert Sánchez-Graells (How To Crack A Nut)
Those following the commentary on the UK Procurement Bill will have noticed the discussions concerning the absence of a clause on the general principles of procurement [see e.g. K McGaughey, ‘Losing your principles – some early thoughts on the Procurement Bill’ (13 May 2022) http://shorturl.at/tFJP2]. In fact, there is already a proposed amendment by Baroness Hayman seeking to introduce the principles as initially envisaged in the green paper, which risks losing the additions that resulted from the public consultation. However, it is not certain that the amendment will make it to the final version of the future Act. One of the reasons behind resisting the inclusion of general principles seems to be a concern by legislative drafters that it would generate additivity — which I understand as the risk of creating self-standing obligations beyond those explicitly imposed by the specific provisions of the primary (and future secondary) legislation.
In my view, the inclusion of general principles cannot generate such a risk of additivity, as the role and function of those principles is to act as interpretive guides for the provisions in the legislation. They can hardly be seen as gap fillers or generators of self-standing obligations. Conversely, the absence of such general principles can be problematic, not only for creating a vacuum of interpretive guidance, but also for seemingly signalling a deviation from global standards.
Below are the reasons why I think the general principles of procurement, and in particular those of transparency and competition, should be included in an amended Bill before it completes its Parliamentary procedure.
GENERAL PRINCIPLES AS GLOBAL STANDARDS
Transparency and competition are crucial and intertwined general principles and/or goals in every procurement legislative framework. However, both are missing in the Procurement Bill, which thus lags international standards and best practice…
Featured News
EU Regulators Set to Clear Microsoft’s $13B OpenAI Investment
Apr 17, 2024 by
CPI
Biden Pledges to Block US Steel Acquisition by Japanese Firm
Apr 17, 2024 by
CPI
Canada Targets Tech Titans with New Digital Tax in 2024
Apr 17, 2024 by
CPI
EU Privacy Watchdog Calls for Meta to Offer Ad-Free Option
Apr 17, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Overhaul Targets Tech Titans Like Apple
Apr 17, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – China Edition – Year of the Dragon
Apr 16, 2024 by
CPI
Review Logic and Rules for Concentrations of Undertakings that Do Not Meet the Standard of Notification
Apr 16, 2024 by
CPI
China’s Review of Semiconductor Transactions
Apr 16, 2024 by
CPI
Key Challenges and Tips for Merger Control Filing in China for Listed Companies
Apr 16, 2024 by
CPI
Key Point Review: China SPC Antitrust Judgments in 2023
Apr 16, 2024 by
CPI