A federal appeals court did not immediately decide on Apple’s appeal of an earlier ruling that found the company to have conspired to fix eBook prices, say reports, as the high-profile case earns more attention.
Oral arguments were held Monday at the 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals. The technology giant is looking to reverse US District Judge Denise Cote’s ruling that Apple violated antitrust law in fixing eBook prices, a decision stemming from the lawsuit filed by the Department of Justice.
But since the ruling, which eventually lead to an independent antitrust monitor, state class action filings, and more appeals, experts are questioning whether Judge Cote got it wrong.
Apple’s appeal surrounded the argument that the company was a new entrant in the eBooks market that was already dominated by Amazon. Lawyers for the company argued Monday that Amazon’s monopoly power allowed it to price eBooks at artificially low costs.
Apple entered the scene, lawyers argue, and offered new pricing options. “That’s competition,” Apple lawyer Theodore J. Boutrous Jr. said. “That’s not price-fixing.”
According to reports, at least one member of the three-judge panel seemed skeptical of the DOJ’s argument. Circuit Judge Dennis Jacobs is said to have accepted Apple’s argument, declaring that, in one possible interpretation of the situation, “these people got together to defeat a monopoly.”
But with a closer look into Apple’s argument, experts note that the case has major implications for antitrust law and teeters on complex antitrust theory.
The company is arguing that vertical price-fixing arrangements are not per se illegal; in Apple’s appellate brief, the company pointed to the Supreme Court decision on Leegin Creative Leather Prods v. PSKS to show precedent that weighs vertical price restraints by the “rule of reason” approach.”
The Solicitor General’s office raised eyebrows last week when it was revealed a member of the office would join the DOJ in defending its case against Apple, sparking rumors the suit could be headed to the Supreme Court itself.
Full content: Fortune and ABC News
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
BHP Unveils £31bn Mining Megamerger Proposal with Anglo American
Apr 25, 2024 by
nhoch@pymnts.com
ByteDance Prefers Shutdown Over Sale of TikTok Amid US Ban Threats
Apr 25, 2024 by
CPI
FCC Votes to Restore Net Neutrality Rules
Apr 25, 2024 by
nhoch@pymnts.com
Apple Rejects Spotify’s Updated App Over In-App Pricing Disclosure
Apr 25, 2024 by
CPI
FCC Set to Reinstate Net Neutrality Rules Today
Apr 25, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI