The US ended an antitrust probe, without filing charges, into whether wireless carriers steered technical standards to make it harder for customers to switch providers, reported the New York Times.
The Justice Department in 2018 demanded information from AT&T, Verizon Communications and other US companies as well as from GSMA, the international trade group that manages standards for the technology, called eSIM.
Smartphones with an eSIM, or embedded subscriber identity module, let users store multiple carrier profiles on the same device. That makes it easy to switch between their networks, although only one can be used at a time.
Smartphones with eSIMs are common in many countries but less often used in the US. The government’s inquiry focused on whether American telecom companies might have steered GSMA’s standards-writing process, making it harder for subscribers to switch wireless companies. The department’s 2018 inquiry revived a previous information-gathering process that had wrapped up in 2016.
The department said Wednesday the group and its carrier members “used an unbalanced standard-setting process, with procedures that stacked the deck in their favor” with provisions that limited competition among networks. But antitrust officials stopped short of filing any charges.
Apple and Google owner Alphabet which make devices with eSIM technology, pushed for more leeway to design smartphones with flexible SIMs.
The Justice Department issued a “business review letter” to GSMA that said the London-based group’s updated procedures for managing eSIM standards would comply with antitrust law.
Featured News
FTC Throws the Bag: Tapestry’s Capri Deal Blocked Over Market Monopoly Concerns
Apr 22, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Antitrust Authority Investigates Enel’s Communication of Energy Price Hikes
Apr 22, 2024 by
CPI
UK Data Regulator Uncovers Flaws in Google’s Privacy Sandbox Proposal
Apr 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Body Orders Google to Amend Ad Search Practices
Apr 22, 2024 by
CPI
Senator Blackburn Blasts Ticketmaster Amid DOJ Probe
Apr 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI