A patent deal in which Endo Pharmaceuticals paid generic-drug maker Impax Laboratories to forgo launching a generic version of an opioid pain medication did not violate consumer protection statutes, a Federal Trade Commission (FTC) administrative law judge ruled Friday, May 18, because the settlement’s pro-competitive benefits outweighed the anticompetitive harm, reported Law360.
The original complaint in 2012 accused Endo of working a deal in which they compensated Watson Laboratories “hundreds of millions of dollars” to hold off a generic version of Endo’s Lidoderm patch. It also accused Endo of paying Impax US$112 million in 2010 to hold off releasing an authorized generic version of Endo’s painkiller Opana. The FTC alleged Endo’s financial gain by giving it time to transition patients to a new formulation of Opana ER, “thereby maintaining its monopoly power.”
Full Content: Law 360
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
DOJ and FTC Introduce Website for Reporting Anti-Competitive Healthcare Practices
Apr 18, 2024 by
CPI
US Congress Advances Legislation to Compel TikTok Sale
Apr 18, 2024 by
CPI
UK Financial Sector Advocates Enhanced Regulatory Accountability
Apr 18, 2024 by
CPI
Google and All 50 States Defend $700 Million Consumer Settlement
Apr 18, 2024 by
CPI
Colorado Enacts First Law to Protect Consumer Brainwave Data
Apr 18, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – China Edition – Year of the Dragon
Apr 16, 2024 by
CPI
Review Logic and Rules for Concentrations of Undertakings that Do Not Meet the Standard of Notification
Apr 16, 2024 by
CPI
China’s Review of Semiconductor Transactions
Apr 16, 2024 by
CPI
Key Challenges and Tips for Merger Control Filing in China for Listed Companies
Apr 16, 2024 by
CPI
Key Point Review: China SPC Antitrust Judgments in 2023
Apr 16, 2024 by
CPI