States suing to stop the US$26 billion merger between T-Mobile and Sprint urged a federal judge not to defer to the Department of Justice (DOJ) when considering whether the merger is legal. The Trump administration’s DOJ gave the deal a green light earlier this year, but states claim the merger is anticompetitive and will harm consumers.
In late December, the DOJ, which isn’t a party to the litigation, filed a “Statement of Interest” asking the federal court hearing the case to defer to its view that the proposed merger should be approved. On Wednesday, January 8, the states, led by attorneys general in New York and California, filed a response, stating, “no such deference was warranted.” The states argued that they “are independent enforcers of the antitrust laws, and it is the role of the Court — not any federal agency — to decide the lawfulness of this merger.”
The states added that the DOJ had conducted “what appears to be only a cursory examination of the approval conditions,” and that the states had investigated the deal for 15 months, reported CNET. The states also took issue with the DOJ’s claims that they hadn’t considered the companies’ promised benefits of faster 5G services for rural residents should the merger go through.
“The Plaintiff States are home to some 19 million rural Americans — nearly a third of the national rural population,” the filing states. “Indeed, the total rural population in the Plaintiff States is more than 30% larger than the rural population in the States that joined the DOJ settlement.”
Full Content: CNet
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
FTC Throws the Bag: Tapestry’s Capri Deal Blocked Over Market Monopoly Concerns
Apr 22, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Antitrust Authority Investigates Enel’s Communication of Energy Price Hikes
Apr 22, 2024 by
CPI
UK Data Regulator Uncovers Flaws in Google’s Privacy Sandbox Proposal
Apr 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Body Orders Google to Amend Ad Search Practices
Apr 22, 2024 by
CPI
Senator Blackburn Blasts Ticketmaster Amid DOJ Probe
Apr 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI