By George S. Ford (Phoenix Center for Advanced Legal & Economic Public Policy Studies)
I conduct an event study on the proposed $26.5 billion merger between Sprint and T-Mobile. Positive and statistically significant stock price effects are observed for the merging firms in response to credible rumors of the transaction, but large and negative returns are observed after the official announcement, reflecting perhaps fears of antitrust impediments to the deal or a response to the release of greater details on the transaction. The pattern of returns for the merging firms and Verizon is consistent with a market power interpretation of the merger. AT&T’s returns appear unaffected by news of the transaction, so one might reasonably conclude the evidence is mixed. Event studies are but one piece in a portfolio of evidence. Industry structure in the mobile wireless industry has been heavily influenced by past regulatory decisions thereby requiring modification to the traditional assessment of the horizontal mergers. The combination of Sprint and T-Mobile warrants thoughtful analysis as it may affect market performance in the mobile wireless industry in either positive and negative ways, or both.
Featured News
FTC Pushes Review of CoStar’s Commercial Real Estate Antitrust Case
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
UK’s CMA Investigates Ardonagh’s Atlanta Group and Markerstudy Merger
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
Greenberg Traurig Grow Financial Regulatory and Compliance Practice
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
Dutch Regulator Fines Uber €10 Million for Privacy Violations
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
DOJ Investigates AI Competition, Eyes Microsoft’s OpenAI Deal: Bloomberg
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – The Rule(s) of Reason
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI
Evolving the Rule of Reason for Legacy Business Conduct
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI
The Object Identity
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI
In Praise of Rules-Based Antitrust
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI
The Future of State AG Antitrust Enforcement and Federal-State Cooperation
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI