A PYMNTS Company

EU: Credit Agricole slams Commission for bias in Euribor case

By  |  May 27, 2014

France’s third largest bank Credit Agricole is reportedly fight back against the European Commission for what it considers a bias in the regulator’s investigation of alleged Euribor manipulation.

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    According to two unnamed sources, Credit Agricole sent a letter to the Commission accusing its Commissioner Joaquin Almunia and the rest of the competition team of impeding the bank’s right to present a defense because the authority had already declared the banks accused in the case a cartel.

    Credit Agricole was one of three lenders to deny a settlement with the Commission, which ultimately fined three other banks – RBS, Deutsche Bank and Societe Generale – a total of about $1.4 billion. Barclays was not fined under the Commission’s leniency program.

    One expert told reporters that Credit Agricole’s claims of bias could be used as one of its grounds for appealing the Commission official complaint, sent to the banks last week. The statement of objections were sent to JPMorgan Chase and HSBC in addition to Credit Agricole.

    According to sources, however, Credit Agricole’s accusatory letter was likely sent before the statement of objections was sent to the lender.

    Spokespeople for the bank and for EU regulators declined to comment on the matter.

    Full content: Businessweek

    Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.