Posted by Social Science Research Network
Richard M. Steuer (Mayer Brown LLP)
Abstract: The time has come to begin a serious discussion of the overhaul of America’s antitrust statutes. Simpler and more contemporary language would make those statutes easier to comprehend and would foster harmonization with the competition laws of other jurisdictions. Proposals for a global competition law have been discussed repeatedly in the past but none is likely to be adopted anytime soon, if ever. A more realistic path to harmonization is for each country to streamline its own statutes, moving as far as it comfortably can in the direction of others. This article illustrates how the U.S. antitrust statutes can be rewritten, without changing the substance of the law. This would make them easier to understand both within the U.S. and abroad, facilitating compliance and harmonization with the statutes of other jurisdictions. The article also compares the illustration with statutes from several other jurisdictions around the world. An overhaul of America’s antitrust statutes will not happen overnight, but the author maintains that it is time to begin considering how best to bring those statutes into the 21st Century.
Featured News
FTC Pushes Review of CoStar’s Commercial Real Estate Antitrust Case
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
UK’s CMA Investigates Ardonagh’s Atlanta Group and Markerstudy Merger
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
Greenberg Traurig Grow Financial Regulatory and Compliance Practice
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
Dutch Regulator Fines Uber €10 Million for Privacy Violations
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
DOJ Investigates AI Competition, Eyes Microsoft’s OpenAI Deal: Bloomberg
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – The Rule(s) of Reason
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI
Evolving the Rule of Reason for Legacy Business Conduct
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI
The Object Identity
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI
In Praise of Rules-Based Antitrust
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI
The Future of State AG Antitrust Enforcement and Federal-State Cooperation
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI