Apple told appellate judges on Thursday that video game maker Epic Games had failed to show any legal error that would justify them overturning a lower-court ruling that found key App Store policies do not break US antitrust law.
Epic, known for its Fortnite game, largely lost a trial last year over whether Apple’s payment rules for apps were anticompetitive. That decision found Apple had suitable reasons to force some app makers such as Epic to use its payment system and take commissions of 15 percent to 30 percent on their sales.
Following the ruling, Epic appealed in the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals. Apple in its reply on Thursday said Epic had failed to propose a reasonable alternative to the App Store policies.
“Epic asks the Judiciary to fundamentally change the App Store by forcing Apple to abandon the integrated distribution and digital-content delivery model that, among many other procompetitive benefits, helps safeguard user security and privacy,” the court filing said.
In the appeal, Epic Games asked whether Judge Yvonne Gonzalez-Rogers had made mistakes with some of her findings, including that Apple is not a monopolist.
Both Apple and Epic are scheduled to file a second round of arguments before the appeals panel calls a hearing, for possibly next year. In support of Epic’s appeal, attorneys general for 34 US states and the District of Columbia said in January that Apple is stifling competition through its mobile app store.
Both Epic and Apple filed appeals following the initial ruling, asking for a stay on the injunction that lets developers add in-app links to payment websites, according to company representatives and documents filed on October 8.
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.