Three of Australia’s biggest retail chains have been referred to the privacy regulator by a major consumer group which has said they use “unreasonably intrusive” facial recognition technology on customers. The Office of the Australian Information Commissioner said it is reviewing the complaint, which argues that the three companies collect personal and sensitive information without consent.
As Reuters reported Monday (June 27), CHOICE has filed a complaint with the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC), citing what it calls unwarranted use of the technology at appliance chain The Good Guys, hardware supplier Bunnings and the Australian arm of Kmart.
Amy Pereira, a policy adviser for CHOICE, said facial recognition technology put people at risk of “invasion of privacy, misidentification, discrimination, profiling and exclusion, as well as vulnerability to cybercrime through data breaches and identity theft,” Reuters reported.
“CHOICE urges you as Commissioner to investigate this matter further and consider taking enforcement action against Kmart, Bunnings and The Good Guys for failure to meet their obligations under the (Privacy) Act,” she said in the complaint.
The OAIC told Reuters it is reviewing the complaint. Simon McDowell, chief operating officer at Bunnings, said the chain only used facial recognition for security after “an increase in the number of challenging interactions our team have had to handle” and that his company was “disappointed by CHOICE’s inaccurate characterization.”
JB Hi-Fi and Kmart were not immediately available for comment Monday morning.
Reuters notes that if the OAIC proceeds with an investigation, it would be Australia’s largest facial recognition investigation. Consumer groups around the world have cautioned that the technology could lead to invasions of privacy and potential racial profiling.
Last month, a group of Democratic senators called on the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to investigate whether identity verification services provider ID.me had made “multiple misleading statements” about its facial recognition use.
U.S. Senators Ron Wyden of Oregon, Cory Booker of New Jersey, Edward J. Markey of Massachusetts and Alex Padilla of California said in the letter that the company has made numerous statements in the past year that its “one-to-one” facial recognition technology was superior to “one-to-many” facial recognition, in which a person’s photo is checked against a “digital lineup” of other people.
Featured News
T-Mobile’s Acquisition of Ka’ena Corporation Receives FCC Approval
Apr 26, 2024 by
CPI
UK Regulator Announces Two New Senior Executive Appointments
Apr 26, 2024 by
CPI
Paramount Global and Skydance Media Near Merger Deal, Eyeing CEO Change
Apr 26, 2024 by
CPI
BHP Unveils £31bn Mining Megamerger Proposal with Anglo American
Apr 25, 2024 by
nhoch@pymnts.com
ByteDance Prefers Shutdown Over Sale of TikTok Amid US Ban Threats
Apr 25, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI