This article is part of a Journal. See more from this Journal

Bundling and Tying: Should Regulators Use the Per Se Approach or the Rule-of-Reason Approach? Lessons from the Economics Literature

Alexander Elbittar, Sonia Di Giannatale, Dec 20, 2012

A firm that practices tying in the United States can be committing a per se violation of the an- titrust law, and it can be also considered a per se violation of the Article 102 of the EC Treaty. However, there is evidence for the use of the rule-of-reason approach in some courts' decisions in tying cases, such as United States vs. Microsoft in 2001 and the case against Microsoft in the EC in 2004. Therefore, the question of when a tying case should be ruled under the per se approach or under the rule-of-reason approach is valid and has policy implications. This article is written to shed light into what could be the appropriate answer by presenting several lessons that we can learn from the economics literature.

Links to Full Content

Comments

You can't post comments until you have logged in. Please login here or register.

Comments

  • Posted by Herbert Hovenkamp, 08/02/2013 8:55am (1 year ago)

RSS feed for comments on this page | RSS feed for all comments