Daniel Crane, Feb 28, 2010 The Federal Trade Commission’s (“FTC’s”) unprecedented enforcement action against Intel raises profound issues concerning the scope of the FTC’s powers to give a construction to…

In this issue: Welcome to the home page of The CPI Antitrust Chronicle (formerly GCP Magazine).  In this issue, we’re taking the first of what will probably be many looks…

Kent Bernard, Feb 28, 2010 Intel has managed to find itself in the cross-hairs of the antitrust authorities in Brussels and in Washington D.C.It is doubtful if that was a…

Robert Lande, Feb 28, 2010 Much of the Federal Trade Commission’s (“FTC’s”) Complaint against Intel is identical or similar to charges in cases filed by the European Commission and by…

Amanda Reeves, Feb 28, 2010 Over the last few years, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) has awakened Section 5’s “unfair methods of competition” prong from its slumber and ignited a…

Geoffrey Manne, Feb 28, 2010 There is a real danger that the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) actually believes its stated rationale for bringing its case against Intel under Section 5…

Keith Hylton, Feb 28, 2010 The Federal Trade Commission’s (“FTC’s”) new legal attack on Intel threatens to leave the company a shell of its former self. The Commission claims that…

Herbert Hovenkamp, Feb 28, 2010 While the FTC has statutory authority to enforce the Clayton Act, it cannot enforce the Sherman Act directly. The Supreme Court has repeatedly held, however,…

Daniel Crane, Feb 28, 2010 The Federal Trade Commission’s (“FTC’s”) unprecedented enforcement action against Intel raises profound issues concerning the scope of the FTC’s powers to give a construction to…