China’s Approach to Compulsory Licensing of Intellectual Property Under Its Anti-Monopoly Law
Michael Jacobs, Xinzhu Zhang, Nov 05, 2010
While a discussion of the misuse of Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs) can be quite broad, this paper focuses on one aspect of a significant question regarding the relationship between antitrust and IP laws:Whether and on what terms courts and competition regulators should compel a dominant firm to license its powerful intellectual property to a smaller rival. As many know, this question has already generated substantial controversy, largely because the relevant law in the United States and Europe provide markedly different answers. In China’s context, since compulsory licensing of IP is so complicated and subtle an issue, it may be too soon to recommend any specific approach. Certainly, more discussion and research are needed. However, as outlined in this paper, certain preliminary steps should be taken.
Featured News
    Senator Warner Calls for Treasury Oversight on Big Tech Sanctions
    Jan 29, 2024 by
        CPI    
    Canada’s Industry Minister Targets Grocery Giants with Antitrust Changes
    Jan 29, 2024 by
        CPI    
    DOT Issues Provisional Ruling Ending Delta-Aeroméxico Partnership
    Jan 29, 2024 by
        CPI    
    US Targets China with Proposed Rules on Cloud Giants in AI Development
    Jan 29, 2024 by
        CPI    
    Australia’s ACCC Finds Limited Evidence of Profiteering in Childcare Sector Despite Soaring Fees
    Jan 29, 2024 by
        CPI    
Antitrust Mix by CPI
    Antitrust Chronicle® – The Rule(s) of Reason
    Jan 29, 2024 by
        CPI    
    Evolving the Rule of Reason for Legacy Business Conduct
    Jan 29, 2024 by
        CPI    
    The Object Identity
    Jan 29, 2024 by
        CPI    
    In Praise of Rules-Based Antitrust
    Jan 29, 2024 by
        CPI    
    The Future of State AG Antitrust Enforcement and Federal-State Cooperation
    Jan 29, 2024 by
        CPI