Corinne Chew, R. Ian McEwin, Nov 05, 2010
The Baidu case, one of the first abuse of dominance cases in China, is important in several respects. First, it was one of the first private competition law actions in China. Second, the judgment was read out in a real-time broadcast. Third, the legal reasoning was more detailed than in other competition law cases. Fourth, the Court stressed the importance of economic reasoning and evidence in deciding such cases. This paper analyzes both the facts of the case and its significance.
Links to Full Content
Featured News
    Senator Warner Calls for Treasury Oversight on Big Tech Sanctions
    Jan 29, 2024 by
        CPI    
    Canada’s Industry Minister Targets Grocery Giants with Antitrust Changes
    Jan 29, 2024 by
        CPI    
    DOT Issues Provisional Ruling Ending Delta-Aeroméxico Partnership
    Jan 29, 2024 by
        CPI    
    US Targets China with Proposed Rules on Cloud Giants in AI Development
    Jan 29, 2024 by
        CPI    
    Australia’s ACCC Finds Limited Evidence of Profiteering in Childcare Sector Despite Soaring Fees
    Jan 29, 2024 by
        CPI    
Antitrust Mix by CPI
    Antitrust Chronicle® – The Rule(s) of Reason
    Jan 29, 2024 by
        CPI    
    Evolving the Rule of Reason for Legacy Business Conduct
    Jan 29, 2024 by
        CPI    
    The Object Identity
    Jan 29, 2024 by
        CPI    
    In Praise of Rules-Based Antitrust
    Jan 29, 2024 by
        CPI    
    The Future of State AG Antitrust Enforcement and Federal-State Cooperation
    Jan 29, 2024 by
        CPI