Posted by Social Science Research Network
Common Ownership Concentration and Corporate Conduct
By Martin C. Schmalz (University of Michigan)
Abstract: The question whether and how ownership between strategically interacting firms affects firm behavior has been the subject of theoretical inquiry for decades. Recent empirical research has provided evidence for the validity of some of the literature’s key predictions. In addition, consolidation and increasing concentration in the asset management industry has led to more pronounced linkages between firms, thus fueling a resurgence of the literature. The resulting antitrust concerns have received much attention from policy makers worldwide. However, the implications are more general: common ownership concentration (CoOCo) affects the objective function of the firm, and therefore has implications for all subfields of economics with an interest in corporate behavior — including corporate governance, strategy, industrial organization, and all of financial economics. This article connects the papers establishing the theoretical foundations and reviews the existing empirical literature with a focus on challenges and opportunities for future research.
Featured News
FTC Pushes Review of CoStar’s Commercial Real Estate Antitrust Case
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
UK’s CMA Investigates Ardonagh’s Atlanta Group and Markerstudy Merger
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
Greenberg Traurig Grow Financial Regulatory and Compliance Practice
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
Dutch Regulator Fines Uber €10 Million for Privacy Violations
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
DOJ Investigates AI Competition, Eyes Microsoft’s OpenAI Deal: Bloomberg
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – The Rule(s) of Reason
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI
Evolving the Rule of Reason for Legacy Business Conduct
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI
The Object Identity
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI
In Praise of Rules-Based Antitrust
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI
The Future of State AG Antitrust Enforcement and Federal-State Cooperation
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI