Competition Buzz: The Foundations of Unfair Terms Regulation: An Alternative Economic Analysis
By: Roger Merino
The new Peruvian “Code of Protection and Defense of Consumers” has been blamed of “socialist” and “fascist” because it prohibits unfair terms. For the critics this regulation would be paternalistic and inefficient by limiting the consumers “right to choice.” These critiques are based on an orthodox economic analysis rooted in neoclassical economics on one hand, and Austrian economic on the other hand. The aim of this essay is to criticize the conservative critique by demonstrating that there are alternative economic movements that provide strong economic, social and ethic foundations for the regulation of unfair terms.
Full Content (in Spanish): SSRN
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
FTC Pushes Review of CoStar’s Commercial Real Estate Antitrust Case
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
UK’s CMA Investigates Ardonagh’s Atlanta Group and Markerstudy Merger
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
Greenberg Traurig Grow Financial Regulatory and Compliance Practice
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
Dutch Regulator Fines Uber €10 Million for Privacy Violations
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
DOJ Investigates AI Competition, Eyes Microsoft’s OpenAI Deal: Bloomberg
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – The Rule(s) of Reason
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI
Evolving the Rule of Reason for Legacy Business Conduct
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI
The Object Identity
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI
In Praise of Rules-Based Antitrust
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI
The Future of State AG Antitrust Enforcement and Federal-State Cooperation
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI