By Bruce M. Owen (Stanford University)
Media of communication present challenges to regulators and antitrust analysts. While it has become traditional to view media as “platforms” that support “multi-sided markets,” it is far from clear that media markets for inputs and outputs are usefully treated as belonging to a new and unique category of business enterprise. Most firms produce multiple products or services and make or buy multiple inputs. A price change for any one of these inputs or outputs affects the demand and supply of all other inputs and outputs, either through demand or supply relationships or both. Media are different from other firms because they supply goods that are non-rivalrous, subject to network effects and important to political processes. Calling such firms “platforms” and subjecting them to an analytical island reserved for “multi-sided markets” does not advance our understanding of media antitrust and regulatory policy issues.
Featured News
FTC Pushes Review of CoStar’s Commercial Real Estate Antitrust Case
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
UK’s CMA Investigates Ardonagh’s Atlanta Group and Markerstudy Merger
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
Greenberg Traurig Grow Financial Regulatory and Compliance Practice
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
Dutch Regulator Fines Uber €10 Million for Privacy Violations
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
DOJ Investigates AI Competition, Eyes Microsoft’s OpenAI Deal: Bloomberg
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – The Rule(s) of Reason
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI
Evolving the Rule of Reason for Legacy Business Conduct
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI
The Object Identity
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI
In Praise of Rules-Based Antitrust
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI
The Future of State AG Antitrust Enforcement and Federal-State Cooperation
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI