By Maarten Pieter Schinkel & Abel d’Ailly (University of Amsterdam)
Western competition authorities responded quick and united to the COVID-19 pandemic with a generous exemption from cartel law for any companies that aim to solve pressing scarcities in anticompetitive collaboration. However there is little reason to expect more supply, fair distribution, low prices or wider use of personal protective equipment from horizontal collaboration. The agencies should better have stood by competition instead. Embracing the policy might have been about public image, more than high expectations of collaboration amongst rivals contributing to solving the needs associated with COVID-19. That experimental treatment is not without side effects. By relaxing the first article of antitrust, the agencies undermined their authority, just when we need them to effectively control the many markets that are rapidly consolidating, due to the consequences of the lock-downs.
Featured News
Dutch Regulator Fines Uber €10 Million for Privacy Violations
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
DOJ Investigates AI Competition, Eyes Microsoft’s OpenAI Deal: Bloomberg
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
Japanese Regulator Approves Korean Air’s Merger with Asiana Airlines
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
Netgear Files Antitrust Lawsuit Against Huawei Alleging Patent Misuse
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
Tennessee and Virginia Attorneys General Challenge NCAA’s NIL Rules in Federal Lawsuit
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – The Rule(s) of Reason
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI
Evolving the Rule of Reason for Legacy Business Conduct
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI
The Object Identity
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI
In Praise of Rules-Based Antitrust
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI
The Future of State AG Antitrust Enforcement and Federal-State Cooperation
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI