On Friday, January 28, a federal judge declined to dismiss a criminal antitrust indictment alleging dialysis provider DaVita and its former CEO Kent Thiry conspired with competitors not to hire each other’s senior employees, reported Reuters.
Senior US District Judge R. Brooke Jackson in Denver spurned arguments from the defendants that the agreements DaVita, one of the largest dialysis providers in the US, made with other companies not to solicit employees did not violate antitrust law.
“Defendants are right that there are no cases perfectly analogous to this case,” Jackson wrote. “But that is the nature of Section 1 of the Sherman Act: as violators use new methods to suppress competition by allocating the market or fixing prices these new methods will have to be prosecuted for a first time.”
Jackson said in his ruling the “defendants had ample notice that entering a naked agreement to allocate the market would expose them to criminal liability, however they did it.”
A lawyer for DaVita, John Walsh of Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr, did not immediately return a message on Friday seeking comment. A DaVita representative in a statement called the charges “unwarranted and unsupported under law.”
An attorney for Thiry, Cliff Stricklin of King & Spalding, said in a statement, “We continue to believe this is an unjust and unconstitutional overreach by federal government prosecutors.”
Lawyers for DaVita and Thiry stated in a court filing in September that nonsolicitation agreements “have plausible procompetitive benefits.”
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Redfin Settles $9.2M Commission Inflation Lawsuits
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
DOJ Supports Colorado’s Efforts to Block Kroger-Albertsons Merger
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
Japan Considers Regulation of AI Developers
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
European Commission Extends Decision Deadline for Ita-Lufthansa Merger
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
UK, US and Australia Sanction Senior Leader of LockBit Cybercrime Gang
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI