In a statement on Friday, the Justice Department’s antitrust division has urged the National Labor Relations Board to clarify how it defines an employee.
The DOJ’s statement came in a dispute between make-up artists and other stylists working for The Atlanta Opera, in which the NLRB found the workers to be employees and not independent contractors, reported The Information.
“Millions of American workers who, until recently, would have been properly classified as employees have seen their work recategorized as independent contracting and have thereby lost crucial [labor] protections,” the DOJ said in urging the NLRB to clarify the definition of how employees are classified. “This trend has been accelerated by the rapid rise of digital platform intermediaries, whose core business model often relies on coordinating the work of large numbers of workers while disclaiming the traditional responsibilities of an employer.”
“Given the close practical relationship between the NLRB’s definition of “employment” and the availability of these antitrust exemptions, any ambiguity in interpreting the NLRB’s “employee” standard created by recent economic changes may have significant consequences for antitrust enforcement, to the detriment of workers and employers alike. Additionally, a growing consensus suggests that a vague or under-inclusive standard also may risk harming competition directly, both by reducing the ability of workers to resist anticompetitive terms and conditions of employment and by creating opportunities for employers to undercut competition by misclassifying their own employees. The Division therefore supports the NLRB in its efforts to modernize its standard in a way that reflects these significant, recent changes in our national economy and advances the shared goals of both the antitrust laws and the NLRA.”
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Judge Mehta Questions Both Sides in Landmark Google Antitrust Case
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
FCC Urges Urgent Funding for Removal of Chinese Telecom Equipment from U.S. Networks
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
Former Pioneer CEO Facing Potential Criminal Charges For Colluding With OPEC
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
South Korea’s Antitrust Regulator Greenlights K-Pop Powerhouse Deal
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
Exxon’s Pioneer Purchase Approved, Former CEO Barred from Board
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI