Winter 2012, Volume 2 Number 2

In this issue:

Why should corporations spend time and money in developing compliance programs when their efforts don't count with the regulators? Are compliance programs worthwhile irregardless? Given such incidents as the diverse approaches of U.S. regulators over Honeywell, different attitudes of Member State authorities and DG Comp, and compliance advice published by global regulators, these questions have become noteworthy. Danny Sokol and Joe Murphy have helped organize a special two-part issue to explore these questions in depth. Last week we presented views from the corporate arena; this week we'll present articles from regulators and others.

And, while a bit apart from the main topic, we bring regulatory emphasis on punishment back to basics with a special article asking, Are Rights Finally Becoming Fundamental?


Compliance, Part 2
  1. Ingrid Breit, Jeroen Capiau, Andrew Essilfie, Feb 22, 2012

    Compliance with Competition Rules—The Way to Go

    While it is clear that companies are under an obligation to comply with the rules, they are largely free to decide how to go about their compliance efforts. Ingrid Breit, Jeroen Capiau, Andrew Essilfie (DG Comp)

  2. Steven Preece, Feb 22, 2012

    OFT Competition Law Compliance Resources

    Successfully creating a compliance culture can help businesses avoid the severe consequences of infringing competition law prohibitions. Steven Preece (OFT)

  3. Feb 22, 2012

    A Balanced Approach to Enforcement and Outreach

    Without advocacy and outreach, enforcement alone cannot positively ensure competitive markets. (Competition Commission of Singapore)

  4. Bill Dee, Feb 22, 2012

    The Australian Approach to Competition Law Compliance Programs

    Pleading compliance programs as a mitigating factor in an enforcement action is not clear cut in Australia. Bill Dee (Compliance and Complaints Advisory Service)

  5. Jeremy West, Feb 22, 2012

    Are We Winning the Fight Against Cartels?

    Competition enforcement agencies have been sending stronger and stronger messages to potential offenders for years. But is anyone receiving them? If they are, do they care? Jeremy West (OECD)

  6. Feb 22, 2012

    Framework-Document of 10 February 2012 on Antitrust Compliance Programmes

    A list of “best practices” that can contribute to the efficiency of antitrust compliance programmes is laid out in the current framework-document. (Autorité de la Concurrence)

  7. Patrick Harrison, Kristina Nordlander, Feb 22, 2012

    Are Rights Finally Becoming Fundamental?

    The EU’s forthcoming direct accession to the ECHR gives the ECtHR and the EU courts the perfect opportunity to find that competition law proceedings must fully respect the fair trial rights and presumption of innocence. Kristina Nordlander & Patrick Harrison (Sidley Austin)


About the Antitrust Chronicle

The CPI Antitrust Chronicle is published online, semi-monthly. It contains cutting-edge commentary on current global antitrust and competition policy issues.

Past Issues


Managing Editor: Lauren Chiang

Senior Editor: Lindsay W. McSweeney

Social Media: Anna Tzanaki

Subscription Manager: Susan Roberts

Office Manager: Kristen Adrian

Editorial Advisory Board:

Rosa Abrantes-Metz, Global Econ. Group, Stern School of Bus. at NYU

Kent Bernard, Fordham School of Law

Rachel Brandenburger, Washington D.C.

Adrian Emch, Hogan Lovells

Kyriakos Fountoukakos, Herbert Smith

Jay Himes, Labaton Sucharow

James Killick, White & Case

Stephen Kinsella, Sidley Austin

Ioannis Lianos, University College London

Elisa Mariscal, Federal Competition Commission, Mexico

Robert O'Donoghue, Brick Court Chambers

Aaron Panner, Kellogg, Huber, Hansen

Nicolas Petit, University of Lìege

Daniel Sokol, University of Florida Levin School of Law

Joshua Wright, George Mason Law School