In the wake of news that his former friends and peers are cooperating with authorities, FTX crypto founder Sam Bankman-Fried is expected to enter a plea at his criminal arraignment in Manhattan, New York, next week.
Whether that plea proclaims his guilt or innocence remains to be seen, but Reutersreported Wednesday (Dec. 28) that the disgraced founder of the since-failed FTX cryptocurrency exchange is scheduled to appear before a judge on Jan. 3, 2023, in federal court in New York City, according to court documents.
He’ll be arraigned before Judge Lewis Kaplan. The previous judge overseeing Bankman-Fried’s criminal case, Ronnie Abrams, recused herself last week (Dec. 23) because her husband is a partner at Polk Davis & Wardell, a law firm that advised Bankman-Fried’s cryptocurrency company FTX last year. Abrams’ husband, Greg Andres, was not associated with the FTX work.
Bankman-Fried has been charged by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) with eight criminal counts that range from wire fraud to various conspiracy counts. Bankman-Fried has maintained his innocence in the events that led to the rapid implosion of his crypto empire and the loss of billions of misallocated customer funds.
Read more: FTX United States Extradition Remains Unresolved, Bankman-Fried Still Imprisoned
An arraignment is the formal reading of criminal charges against a defendant in that defendant’s presence. Its purpose is to ensure the accused is properly aware of the charges.
After being read the charges, a defendant may enter a plea or — depending in which legal jurisdiction the arraignment is being held — may choose not to submit one.
The news of his expected plea follows the news, as reported by PYMNTS, that both Caroline Ellison, former CEO of FTX sister firm Alameda Research, and Gary Wang, FTX’s former chief technology officer, have pleaded guilty to the fraud charges brought against them and agreed to cooperate with authorities.
That news, which was kept embargoed from the media until Bankman-Fried was extradited to the U.S., has no doubt put pressure on the one-time wunderkind of crypto.
In Ellison’s testimony, she described and admitted guilt to a number of fraudulent acts she claims to have participated in going back to 2019.
Featured News
Judge Mehta Questions Both Sides in Landmark Google Antitrust Case
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
FCC Urges Urgent Funding for Removal of Chinese Telecom Equipment from U.S. Networks
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
Former Pioneer CEO Facing Potential Criminal Charges For Colluding With OPEC
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
South Korea’s Antitrust Regulator Greenlights K-Pop Powerhouse Deal
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
Exxon’s Pioneer Purchase Approved, Former CEO Barred from Board
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI