Multinational cab aggregator Uber refuted the allegations levelled by its Indian rival Meru for resorting to unfair trade practices including predatory pricing and pleaded the Supreme Court on Wednesday to quash Competition Appellate Tribunal (Compat) order directing a probe against it.
Appearing before a bench of Justices Dipak Misra, A M Khanwilkar and M M Shantanagoudar, Uber’s counsel Kapil Sibal contended that the company was not a dominant player in online transportation network sector and there was no possibility of the company misusing its position as a market leader. He said that Ola has greater market share in comparison to Uber.
Uber approached the apex court challenging the order passed by the tribunal which had on on December 7 directed the fair trade watchdog Competition Commission of India to conduct a fresh probe against it for allegedly indulging in unfair practices.
The tribunal had passed the order on a plea of Meru Travels Solution accusing the multi-national company of resorting to abusive practices with an intent to establish its monopoly and eliminate other competitors by granting huge discounts and incentives to its customers.
Challenging the tribunal’s verdict, Uber told the apex court that the order was illegal and suffering from “jurisdictional flaw” as the tribunal itself had come to the conclusion there was prima facie nothing against it.
Full Content: India News
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
T-Mobile’s Acquisition of Ka’ena Corporation Receives FCC Approval
Apr 26, 2024 by
CPI
UK Regulator Announces Two New Senior Executive Appointments
Apr 26, 2024 by
CPI
Paramount Global and Skydance Media Near Merger Deal, Eyeing CEO Change
Apr 26, 2024 by
CPI
BHP Unveils £31bn Mining Megamerger Proposal with Anglo American
Apr 25, 2024 by
nhoch@pymnts.com
ByteDance Prefers Shutdown Over Sale of TikTok Amid US Ban Threats
Apr 25, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI