Posted by Social Science Research Network
Informant Reward Schemes in Competition Enforcement – Jan PolaÅ„ski
ABSTRACT: The idea of rewarding private parties who participate in the enforcement of public rules is not uncommon. Still, in the field of competition enforcement the policy of rewarding acts which are beneficial to the public is limited. Typically, it takes the form of forgoing or reducing penalties under leniency programmes or settlement procedures, rather than providing rewards which would benefit their recipients in a more meaningful way. This article discusses why competition enforcement should more firmly follow the policy of providing rewards and financial incentives to private parties and how such systems may work.
Featured News
FTC Pushes Review of CoStar’s Commercial Real Estate Antitrust Case
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
UK’s CMA Investigates Ardonagh’s Atlanta Group and Markerstudy Merger
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
Greenberg Traurig Grow Financial Regulatory and Compliance Practice
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
Dutch Regulator Fines Uber €10 Million for Privacy Violations
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
DOJ Investigates AI Competition, Eyes Microsoft’s OpenAI Deal: Bloomberg
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – The Rule(s) of Reason
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI
Evolving the Rule of Reason for Legacy Business Conduct
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI
The Object Identity
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI
In Praise of Rules-Based Antitrust
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI
The Future of State AG Antitrust Enforcement and Federal-State Cooperation
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI