A judge denied video gamers’ request for a preliminary injunction to stop Microsoft from acquiring Activision Blizzard Inc. The judge ruled that the gamers did not provide sufficient evidence of irreparable harm from the proposed $69 billion deal, per Reuters.
“After the merger (if it happens), they can play Call of Duty exactly as they played just before the merger,” Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley of the US District Court for the Northern District of California wrote in her May 19 ruling.
In December, private plaintiffs filed a lawsuit against Microsoft in California federal court, seeking an injunction against a deal they deemed detrimental to competition.
Read more: Gamers File New Legal Challenge To Microsoft’s $69B To Buy “Call of Duty” Maker
US District Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley ruled on Friday that the video gamers had not provided sufficient evidence of irreversible harm if the merger were to proceed prior to her ruling on the case’s merits.
Microsoft and its lawyers argue that the acquisition would have a positive impact on consumers.
Corley refuted the gamers’ claim that Microsoft would restrict access to the game. The judge determined that there was no proof that Microsoft could render existing versions of “Call of Duty” inoperable following the proposed merger, according to Corley’s account.
“The day after the merger they can play exactly the same way they played with their friends before the merger,” Corley wrote. The judge also said “it is not likely” Microsoft will make any newer version of “Call of Duty” exclusive to the company’s platform prior to a ruling on the merits of the deal.
Featured News
FTC to Approve Exxon’s $64 Billion Deal with Pioneer Resources, Excludes
May 1, 2024 by
CPI
UK Competition Watchdog Raises Alarm Over Nvidia’s ARM Takeover
May 1, 2024 by
CPI
Sen. Klobuchar Urges Regulators to Probe Collusion in Health Care Pricing
May 1, 2024 by
CPI
Multiple States Join Tennessee’s Antitrust Lawsuit Against NCAA Over NIL Rules
May 1, 2024 by
CPI
NY AG Joins Suit Challenging NCAA’s Restrictions on Student Athlete NIL Rights
May 1, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI