Posted by Social Science Research Network
Monopolization Through Patent Theft– Christopher R. Leslie (University of California)
Abstract: Patent theft occurs when a firm steals an innovator’s idea and then files an application for a patent on that invention with the Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”). If successful, the patent thief can exclude even the true innovator from making and selling the product that she herself invented. When the patent thief succeeds in stealing and patenting another’s innovation and then using the exclusionary rights granted by the patent to monopolize a market, antitrust principles are implicated. Section 2 of the Sherman Act condemns illegal monopolization, which is monopolization through anticompetitive conduct instead of through competition on the merits. The Supreme Court has long held that patent fraud is anticompetitive conduct.
Featured News
FTC Pushes Review of CoStar’s Commercial Real Estate Antitrust Case
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
UK’s CMA Investigates Ardonagh’s Atlanta Group and Markerstudy Merger
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
Greenberg Traurig Grow Financial Regulatory and Compliance Practice
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
Dutch Regulator Fines Uber €10 Million for Privacy Violations
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
DOJ Investigates AI Competition, Eyes Microsoft’s OpenAI Deal: Bloomberg
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – The Rule(s) of Reason
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI
Evolving the Rule of Reason for Legacy Business Conduct
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI
The Object Identity
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI
In Praise of Rules-Based Antitrust
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI
The Future of State AG Antitrust Enforcement and Federal-State Cooperation
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI