Posted by Social Science Research Network
Most-Favoured-Customer Clauses and Two-Sided Platforms
Daniel Zimmer (University of Bonn) & Martin Blaschczok (Government Germany)
Abstract: Clauses stipulating preferential treatment, known as ‘most-favoured-nation’ (MFN) or ‘most-favoured-customer’ (MFC) clauses, have received increased competition-law attention owing to the proceedings of the European Commission and the Antitrust Division of the US Department of Justice against Apple and five international publishing groups in the E-Books case, as well as the proceedings of the German Federal Cartel Authority against Amazon and HRS. The article delineates the specific characteristics of two-sided platforms and the various types of preferential clauses and their effects on competition. After a brief description of the above-mentioned case proceedings, the contribution pursues the question of how most-favoured-customer clauses that favour two-sided platforms should be assessed under European competition law.
Featured News
FTC Pushes Review of CoStar’s Commercial Real Estate Antitrust Case
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
UK’s CMA Investigates Ardonagh’s Atlanta Group and Markerstudy Merger
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
Greenberg Traurig Grow Financial Regulatory and Compliance Practice
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
Dutch Regulator Fines Uber €10 Million for Privacy Violations
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
DOJ Investigates AI Competition, Eyes Microsoft’s OpenAI Deal: Bloomberg
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – The Rule(s) of Reason
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI
Evolving the Rule of Reason for Legacy Business Conduct
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI
The Object Identity
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI
In Praise of Rules-Based Antitrust
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI
The Future of State AG Antitrust Enforcement and Federal-State Cooperation
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI