Posted by Social Science Research Network
Not Another Drug! Antitrust for Drug and Other Innovations
Richard Gilbert (University of California)
Abstract: A number of antitrust cases have challenged firm conduct associated with the introduction of a new product. Several are in the pharmaceutical industry and have earned the moniker of “product hopping.” Other cases involve the design of interfaces that defeat interoperability and the supply of integrated products that curtail demand for one or more of the integrated components. I propose a framework to compare the costs and benefits of single-firm conduct involving innovation and offer two suggestions for “almost safe” harbors. One is a transition to a new product that is accomplished without constraining consumer choices among existing products. The second “almost safe” harbor is for the development of an improved product, interface or design that impacts the supply of complementary products or services, provided that these complements do not offer a pathway for competition that would undermine monopoly power.
Featured News
FTC Pushes Review of CoStar’s Commercial Real Estate Antitrust Case
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
UK’s CMA Investigates Ardonagh’s Atlanta Group and Markerstudy Merger
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
Greenberg Traurig Grow Financial Regulatory and Compliance Practice
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
Dutch Regulator Fines Uber €10 Million for Privacy Violations
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
DOJ Investigates AI Competition, Eyes Microsoft’s OpenAI Deal: Bloomberg
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – The Rule(s) of Reason
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI
Evolving the Rule of Reason for Legacy Business Conduct
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI
The Object Identity
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI
In Praise of Rules-Based Antitrust
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI
The Future of State AG Antitrust Enforcement and Federal-State Cooperation
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI